Where is the new credit supervision mechanism？ Improving supervision efficiency is the key point.

　　[Building Miles with Integrity]

　　Recently, the Guiding Opinions of the General Office of the State Council on Accelerating the Construction of Social Credit System and Building a New Credit-based Supervision Mechanism (hereinafter referred to as the Opinions) was officially released. On July 18th, at the briefing on the State Council policy held by the State Council Office, Lian Weiliang, deputy director of the National Development and Reform Commission, and responsible persons of relevant departments and localities interpreted the Opinions.

　　Improve the efficiency of supervision: let the supervision force "use good steel on the cutting edge"

　　"The new supervision mechanism based on credit is a supervision mechanism that runs through the whole life cycle before, during and after the event; It is the supervision mechanism of classification; It is a regulatory mechanism that greatly increases the cost of dishonesty; It is a regulatory mechanism for full information sharing and full disclosure according to laws and regulations; Is fully reflected in ‘ Internet plus & rsquo; Big data supervision mechanism characterized by; It is a supervision mechanism that pays more attention to the protection of the rights and interests of market entities; It is a regulatory mechanism that is ruled by law, standardized and standardized. " At the beginning of the briefing, Lian Weiliang summarized the key contents of the new credit-based supervision mechanism from seven aspects.

　　According to reports, the new credit-based supervision mechanism adopts differentiated supervision according to the credit status of market players, which is "nothing to disturb" for trustworthy people and "sword hanging high" for untrustworthy people, which improves the supervision efficiency and makes the supervision force "good steel used in the cutting edge".

　　"The Opinions have new ideas, practical measures and strong pertinence. It is a new top-level design for credit construction and a summary of successful practical experience at the grassroots level. Many new institutional regulations come from Shanghai and Zhejiang." Lian Weiliang revealed.

　　At the briefing, Ji Zhaoliang, member of the Standing Committee of Shanghai Pudong New Area District Committee and executive deputy head of the district, and Du Xuliang, head of Zhejiang Development and Reform Commission, introduced local experiences and practices.

　　Ji Zhaoliang introduced that Pudong New Area has explored the establishment of "six double" government comprehensive supervision "Pudong Sample" based on credit supervision. The core contents include the license connection of "double notification, double feedback and double tracking" and the collaborative supervision of "double random, double evaluation and double publicity", realizing the full coverage of 21 government supervision departments, 108 industries and more than 320,000 enterprises in the whole area. "Zhejiang fully implements credit ‘ 531X’ Engineering, ‘ 5’ Refers to the comprehensive evaluation of public credit for five types of subjects, such as enterprises, natural persons, social organizations, institutions and government agencies. ‘ 3’ Refers to the public credit index system, comprehensive supervision responsibility system, evaluation and reward and punishment system. ‘ 1’ It is a province-wide integrated public credit information platform, ‘ X’ It refers to the application in administrative examination and approval, administrative supervision, public services and other fields. " Du Xuliang said.

　　The cost of dishonesty has risen sharply: serious dishonesty will be expelled from the market.

　　If you break your promise, you will pay the price. In recent years, China has further promoted collaborative supervision and joint punishment, and strengthened the management of the list of abnormal operations and the list of serious illegal and untrustworthy enterprises. Yan Dengfu, head of the Credit Supervision Department of the General Administration of Market Supervision, said that as of the end of June this year, there were 5,189,700 market entities in the national business exception list, and there were 541,700 serious illegal and untrustworthy enterprises. The information of untrustworthy enterprises was pushed to relevant departments to promote the formation of a situation of "one place is untrustworthy and limited everywhere".

　　Although some achievements have been made, Lian Weiliang pointed out that the low cost and low spread of dishonesty are the important reasons for the high incidence, frequent occurrence and recurrence of dishonesty. In this regard, the "Opinions" require the establishment of a list of joint disciplinary measures in accordance with the law, dynamically updated and open to the public, forming a multi-pronged pattern of administrative, market-oriented and industrial disciplinary measures, and extensive participation of social forces.

　　"Including administrative disciplinary measures such as restricting stock issuance, bidding, applying for financial capital projects, and enjoying tax incentives in accordance with laws and regulations, restricting market disciplinary measures such as obtaining credit, flying, taking high-grade trains and seats, and industrial disciplinary measures such as informed criticism and public condemnation." Lian Weiliang emphasized that the Opinions require that food and medicine, ecological environment, engineering quality, safe production, old-age care, urban operation safety and other areas directly related to the safety of people’s lives and property should be the focus, and the untrustworthy subjects and their related responsible persons who have caused heavy losses should be prohibited from entering the market and industries within a certain period of time according to laws and regulations until they are expelled from the market forever. The responsible subject and responsible person of dishonesty should also pay the cost of being held accountable according to the law and regulations. In short, it is necessary to make supervision grow "teeth" and fundamentally solve the problem of repeated and ex situ appearance of dishonesty.

　　According to Wan Cunzhi, director of the Credit Bureau of the People’s Bank of China, the credit constraint is to guard against various types of debt default risks. "At present, there is a market-oriented credit information system and joint disciplinary measures by government departments. The next step is to gradually put ‘ Credit bankruptcy ’ The system introduces the field of credit supervision and provides strong legal support for joint punishment. " The theory of knowing everything.

　　"Three are better, two are lower": Let the trustworthy get benefits.

　　Just like the punishment for dishonesty, trustworthiness incentive is also a key measure for the construction of social credit system. In recent years, while the role of joint punishment for dishonesty has become more and more prominent, joint incentives for trustworthiness are also being accelerated and enriched.

　　Zhang Weihua, head of the Tax Service Department of State Taxation Administration of The People’s Republic of China, said that in 2016, the State Administration of Taxation took the lead in signing a memorandum of cooperation with 16 departments to provide 41 incentive measures covering 18 fields for trustworthy taxpayers, especially the "Bank-Tax Interaction" jointly launched with China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, which effectively solved the problem of difficult and expensive financing for trustworthy SMEs.

　　"Customs divides import and export enterprises into advanced certification enterprises, general certification enterprises, general credit enterprises and untrustworthy enterprises according to the credit situation of enterprises, among which advanced certification enterprises and general certification enterprises are often referred to as China Customs ‘ AEO enterprise ’ 。” Zhang Xiuqing, head of the Enterprise Management Department of the General Administration of Customs, said, "In the first half of this year, the customs inspection rate for untrustworthy enterprises reached 98.12%, and the inspection rate for advanced certification enterprises was less than 0.5%. AEO enterprises can not only enjoy the convenience of customs clearance given by domestic customs, but also enjoy a number of facilitation measures such as giving priority to customs clearance procedures and reducing inspections given by mutually recognized countries (regions), which greatly reduces customs clearance time and trade costs. "

　　Lian Weiliang used "three better, two lower" to summarize the representative measures to encourage trustworthy people, namely, better administrative services, better financing services, better public services, lower regulatory costs and lower transaction costs. "In the next step, we will increase the practical exploration and establishment of rules and regulations for trustworthy incentives, so that more trustworthy people can truly feel that honesty is valuable, honest and beneficial." Lian Weiliang stressed.

　　 (Reporter chenchen)