On December 30, 2020, Beijing Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd. quietly published a short announcement in official website. According to the interim analysis results of Covid-19 inactivated vaccine phase III clinical trial, the safety of Covid-19 inactivated vaccine of China Bio-Beijing Company of Sinopharm Group was good after inoculation.After two doses of immunization, the positive conversion rate of neutralizing antibody was 99.2%, and the protective power of vaccine against diseases caused by COVID-19 infection (Covid-19) was 79.34%.

Prior to this, Pfizer and Moderna from the United States also released the research results of phase III clinical trials of their own mRNA vaccines, and the protective power was over 90%. In this way, our vaccines seem to have a little poor protective effect. But be careful,This is not because our technology is not good, but more because of the congenital difference between mRNA vaccine and inactivated vaccine.

Immune protection induced by inactivated vaccine is relatively weak.

Inactivated vaccine is a vaccine made by inactivating virus by physical or chemical methods. Compared with live virus particles, the immunogenicity of inactivated virus is relatively weak, and adjuvant is often needed.

In 2013, a study entitled "Characterization of immune responses induced by activated, live attended and DNA vacuums against Japanese encephalitis virus in mice" was confirmed by Japanese encephalitis virus.Compared with artificial attenuated live vaccine and DNA vaccine, the immune response induced by inactivated vaccine is relatively weak.

Figure 1. Heading of the article

The researchers divided the mice into four groups, injected with inactivated vaccine (INV), live attenuated vaccine (LAV), DNA vaccine (pCAG-JME) and control, and then detected the antibody level in mice. At the end of the experiment, the total antibody titer induced by inactivated vaccine was significantly lower than that of attenuated live vaccine group and DNA vaccine group.

Fig. 2 Antibody level pairs induced by three vaccines

The researchers also detected the levels of different subtypes of IgG induced in the serum of mice, and found that there were differences among the three vaccines. The inactivated vaccine mainly induced IgG type 1 antibody, while the attenuated live vaccine mainly induced IgG type 2a antibody, and the antibody levels of DNA vaccine were both high.

Fig. 3 Different IgG subtypes induced by three vaccines

The researchers also compared the levels of cytokines induced by vaccine and the levels of dendritic cells and Treg in detail, and there were some differences. Anyway,There are some differences in immune response induced by inactivated vaccine, attenuated live vaccine and nucleic acid vaccine. It is not surprising that the protective effect of inactivated vaccine is not as good as that of RNA vaccine.

Inactivated vaccine has the best safety.

Because the clinical data of phase III vaccine of Beijing Institute of Biological Products have not been published in any authoritative journals,Therefore, the safety of inactivated vaccine BBIBP-CorV in China, mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 in Pfizer and mRNA vaccine mRNA-1273 in Moderna Company are examined from the published phase I/II clinical trials of vaccines.Someone has made statistics on the safety data of phase I/II clinical trials of various COVID-19 vaccines, and all the data are shown in the following figure. After the first dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine was injected, the incidence of systemic grade I adverse reactions was 53.3%, grade II adverse reactions were 13.3%, local grade I adverse reactions were 73.3%, and grade II adverse reactions were 13.3%. After injecting the second dose, the incidence of systemic first-class adverse reactions was 20%, and the incidence of second-class adverse reactions was 80%. The incidence of local first-class adverse reactions was 66.7%, and the incidence of second-class adverse reactions was 26.7%. No adverse reactions above grade 3 were found locally or systemically.

However, after injection of Pfizer’s BNT162b2, the incidence of local or systemic adverse reactions was 41.7%, and the incidence of adverse events above grade 3 was 8.3%. For people aged 65-85, the incidence of local or systemic adverse reactions is 25%, and the incidence of adverse reactions above grade 3 is 8.3%.

The results of phase I clinical trial of domestic inactivated vaccine BBIBP-CorV in China show that the incidence of first-grade local or systemic adverse reactions is 33% for people aged 18-59, and that of second-grade adverse reactions is 13%. For people over 60, the incidence of adverse reactions is 29%, and there are no adverse events above grade 3. In the results of Phase II clinical trials, the incidence of Grade I adverse events was 15%, and the incidence of Grade II adverse events was 2%.

Fig. 4 Adverse reactions of various vaccines.

Judging from these data, among the three popular vaccines at present, the safety of inactivated vaccine in China is absolutely the best, not to mention the recent allergic storm of Pfizer vaccine, which has caused rare allergic reactions in dozens of people.

Domestic vaccines with 79% protection and no serious adverse reactions are absolutely safe and effective.Because China’s epidemic prevention and control work is very well done, we have to overcome many difficulties when conducting clinical trials of vaccines. After all, the epidemic situation in COVID-19 is well controlled and there is no condition for clinical trials, which is one of the reasons why the progress of phase III clinical trials lags behind others. We should see that even if our protection efficiency does not exceed 90% in the United States, inactivated vaccine obviously has advantages, such as it is safer and easier to store and transport. Although our protective effect is not as good as the two vaccines in the United States, it has reached the standard of vaccine approval, and the protective effect far exceeds 50%, which is trustworthy.

　 　 [XCAR test drive original]

　　　　Domestic pickup truck culture started relatively late compared with European and American countries. Both the market environment and consumers’ concept of car purchase are in a relatively immature stage. I believe that when many people talk about pickup trucks, they still link them with cheapness and freight for the first time. Of course, in the past two years, with the introduction of some American pickup trucks, a high-end pickup truck culture focusing on playing with cars has gradually emerged. Looking at the domestic auto market, the current situation of pickup trucks can be said to be serious. One is the cheap pickup truck based on freight, and the other is the American high-end pickup truck just mentioned. The pickup truck market between these two types is basically blank. The Isuzu D-MAX we test-drive today has a clear mission, which is to strive to be a pioneer in this market.

　　　　Since the D-MAX produced by Isuzu’s domestic joint venture manufacturer (Jiangxi Isuzu) has not been officially launched, we chose Australia, where Isuzu has a large number of pickup trucks and the pickup market is relatively mature, to get close contact with this model.However, after three months, we will be able to see the D-MAX model produced by Jiangxi Isuzu in the domestic market.

　　　　Since D-MAX is about to be produced in China, I have to talk about its manufacturer — — Jiangxi Isuzu. For consumers, this is a strange and young manufacturer. Jiangxi ISUZU is a joint-venture vehicle manufacturer established by Japanese Isuzu in China.It is jointly funded by Japanese Isuzu and jiangling motors Group, with the equity ratio of 50:50.

　　　　The model that Jiangxi Isuzu is about to put into production at present is D-MAX pickup truck, which is the protagonist of our test drive today. At the end of next year, Jiangxi Isuzu will also introduce a heavyweight SUV model for production. This model, named MU-X, has been listed in international markets such as Australia.

　　　　When it comes to the history of D-MAX, if you read the picture below, I believe it can bring back some memories. Isuzu pickup truck began to enter China from TF model. At first, it was introduced and produced by Qingling. Later, domestic independent brands began to copy this model.

　　　　Since it is a pioneer in the domestic mid-range pickup market, does D-MAX really have no competitors? From the perspective of head-on confrontation, there is really no pickup truck model in the domestic mid-range pickup truck market that can be similar to D-MAX in price, configuration and technical level. But from the perspective of positioning, it seems that only Toyota’s hilux can be regarded as a competitor.

　　　　Although Zhengzhou Nissan’s D22 pickup truck is similar to D-MAX in positioning and design, the D22 model is too old to compete with D-MAX in the same generation. The Nissan Navara pickup truck, which can really compete with D-MAX, has no plans to introduce it at present.

　　　　The positioning of Isuzu D-MAX was introduced by the author at the beginning, and it mainly focuses on the mid-range pickup market. In addition to the outstanding loading capacity of pickup trucks, D-MAX has excellent performance in the interior space and passability. Although it is the pioneer of mid-range pickup trucks in China at present, it is also in sync with the international level in terms of technology. However, if D-MAX wants to make some achievements in this strange emerging market, it is indeed difficult to see the current domestic pickup truck environment and road regulations. For example, in a first-tier city like Beijing, the driving of pickup trucks will still be greatly restricted, which is an unavoidable reality.

　　Cctv newsOn August 30th, International Sharp Review, the general radio and television station of China, broadcasted an article entitled "Australia’s reasons for rejecting Huawei are untenable", which was reprinted or quoted by many overseas media.

　　From August 30th to September 1st, CNBC, Singapore Asia News Channel, Malaysia National News Agency Radio, etc. quoted relevant contents or materials. French digital radio LCF facebook account, German-Chinese Report website, Spanish Radio International website, Italian Radio We website (facebook, twitter), Indian Daily Morning News website, Kazakhstan Industrial News website, Jordan Global Radio facebook account, Nordic Times website, Europe-China United Times website and many other overseas media forwarded. The main reports are as follows:

　　For those who are concerned about the development of global telecommunications technology, if asked which company in the world has suffered the most and been censored the most? People may think of China Huawei in unison. Recently, the Australian government banned Huawei from participating in the construction of Australia’s 5G network on the grounds of "network security" in an obscure statement, which hindered the company’s business in Australia.

　　Network security is the focus of all network users and the core concern of all countries. However, this concept should not be too generalized, and even become an excuse to achieve a certain political goal. As far as Australia prohibits Huawei from participating in its 5G network construction, the reason of "network security" is untenable from any level.

　　First of all, from the perspective of cooperation, according to public information, Huawei, as the world’s largest telecom equipment supplier, has cooperated with 45 of the world’s 50 mainstream telecom operators, covering 170 countries and supporting the daily communication needs of more than one-third of the world’s population. If Huawei’s network is not secure, the global telecom giants will never venture to cooperate with it. According to the news released by Huawei, Australian operators have been using Huawei equipment for 15 years, during which there has never been an incident that threatened Australia’s national security; Huawei has never received any questions from the Australian government about its corporate governance and the safety of its business operations.

　　Secondly, from a technical point of view, Huawei, as the largest provider of 4G network technology in Australia, not only promoted the competition in the local telecommunications market, but also reduced the broadband and communication costs of local consumers. With the development of information technology, 5G network with higher speed and lower delay is becoming the next competitive point in the industry. At present, Huawei ranks first in the world in the number of 5G patents, and most western countries, including Britain, New Zealand and Canada, accept Huawei’s common practice of expanding 5G on the basis of 4G. In fact, there is no essential difference between 5G architecture and 4G, and its core network and access network are separated. Compared with 4G, it has a more perfect guarantee mechanism in security and privacy protection. Since Australia asked Huawei to build a 4G network, why not 5G?

　　Thirdly, from the industrial point of view, in today’s highly globalized world, Huawei, Nokia, Ericsson and Apple all have similar global supply chains and production lines, and all of them are made in China. Even if Australia refuses Huawei to participate in the construction of the 5G network and chooses other manufacturers, most of the 5G devices deployed by other manufacturers will still be made in China.

　　"Cyber security" is just an excuse for Australia to close the door to Huawei. It is neither in line with business rules nor aboveboard, and there are deeper political factors behind it. For a long time, China has been Australia’s largest trading partner, and the United States has always provided it with a security umbrella. Australia is trying to find a balance between these two most important foreign relations. Since last year, Australia-China relations have been cold, and the unfriendly side to China in Australia’s domestic atmosphere has risen sharply. China students have been accused, Chinese in Australia have been questioned, and all people or organizations associated with China have been labeled as "unsafe". As a multinational private enterprise in China, Huawei originally participated in Australian business through fair competition, but it was "original sin" because it came from China.

　　The National Defense Authorization Act recently passed by the United States stipulates that it is forbidden for any U.S. government department to use the products of China Huawei and ZTE, and it is also forbidden for any entity that has business relations with the U.S. government to do so. In terms of security, Australia, which has always looked at the United States with a wink, took advantage of the complex domestic political atmosphere to violate the treaties or agreements on bilateral investment and free trade signed by China and Australia in 1988 and 2015, at the expense of the interests of the Australian people, and blocked Huawei from the market under the pretext of "security". According to the latest news, this move has caused Australian communication service providers to prepare to raise prices.

　　China-Australia relations are essentially win-win cooperation. Over the years, Huawei has been rewarded in the Australian market because of its efforts in innovation, and Australia has also accelerated the upgrading of information facilities and the transformation of the digital economy because of the products and services provided by Huawei, and both enterprises and people have a real sense of gain. Commercial issues should not be politicized. If Australia wants to seize the opportunity of information technology and achieve economic growth in the next few decades, it should take off its colored glasses and welcome innovative China enterprises like Huawei to actively participate in its development process.

　　Many overseas media quoted and forwarded "International Sharp Review" articles:

　　As of September 1, 2018, CNBC has quoted relevant content or materials twice.

　　As of September 1, 2018, Singapore Asia News Channel has quoted relevant content or material 6 times.

　　French digital radio LCF facebook account forwarded on August 30, 2018

　　The German-Chinese Report website was forwarded on August 30, 2018.

　　Radio Spain International website forwarded on August 30, 2018

　　Italian Radio We website (facebook, Twitter) forwarded on August 30, 2018.

　　India’s "Daily Morning News" website was forwarded on August 30, 2018

Beijing Zhengban made [1995] No.20

The people’s governments of the districts and counties, the commissions, offices and bureaus of the municipal government, and the municipal institutions:

　　In order to meet the needs of the construction of the socialist market economic system, speed up the construction of the market system in this city, strengthen the macro-control of the municipal government on the agricultural products market, and prosper and stabilize the agricultural products market in the capital, the municipal government has decided to set up the Beijing Central Wholesale Market Management Committee of Vegetables, Fruits and Flowers, which is a fairly bureau-level institution sent by the municipal government to act as the relevant administrative functions of the municipal government.

　　The main duties of the Beijing Central Wholesale Market Management Committee of Vegetables, Fruits and Flowers are: to formulate and organize the implementation of the phased planning and construction plan according to the overall market plan determined by the municipal government, and to handle matters such as land expropriation, project development, land use right transfer, relocation and resettlement of farmers (residents) and enterprises within the overall market plan; In conjunction with relevant departments, review and handle the project initiation, feasibility report, contract articles of association, architectural design and construction of construction projects within the market, and examine and approve various enterprises and import and export agency business in the market; Supervise and manage enterprises and institutions in the market according to law; To study and formulate specific policies, systems and measures for the development, construction, operation and management of this market.

　　The internal organization of Beijing Central Wholesale Market Management Committee of Vegetables, Fruits and Flowers shall be separately approved by the Municipal Compilation Office.　

　　March 25, 1995　　

　　Recently, the market supervision departments in many places issued a notice on the unqualified food sampling list. The Paper combed and found that it involved many problems such as pesticide residues and microbial pollution. The market supervision department has carried out verification and disposal work.

　　It is noteworthy that coliforms were detected in tableware and rice noodles in the unqualified sampling list of several batches of food published by Tai ‘an Municipal Market Supervision Administration and Baise Municipal Market Supervision Administration.

　　Why are coliforms detected in tableware and rice noodles? Kai Zhong, deputy director of Kexin Food and Nutrition Information Exchange Center, said that coliforms mainly come from the intestines of warm-blooded animals, but they are widely distributed in nature. Dishes, rice noodles and so on have coliforms exceeding the standard, mostly because of secondary pollution.

　　Many enterprises were found to contain coliforms in their products.

　　On July 5th, Tai ‘an Municipal Market Supervision Administration issued the information circular on food safety sampling inspection (hereinafter referred to as the circular), which disclosed problems such as excessive pesticide residues and microbial pollution.

　　According to the notice, coliforms were detected in the tableware plates of Fuchunyuan Restaurant in Taishan District and Shandong Xiaolongxiao Jiutian Catering Management Co., Ltd. in Taishan District. According to the national food safety standards, coliforms should not be detected in tableware.

　　Tai ‘an Municipal Market Supervision Administration said in the notice that the market supervision department of the place where the production and operation enterprises are located has ordered the enterprises to find out the product flow, recall and remove the unqualified products, control risks, file an investigation, and analyze the reasons for rectification. The unqualified products involved have been verified and disposed of as required.

　　The Paper combed and found that Baise Municipal Market Supervision Administration had previously released the 26th food safety supervision and sampling information announcement in 2021 on July 1, which also showed that the prepared fresh and wet rice noodles sold by Guangxi Tiandong Weimeijia Agricultural Products Development Co., Ltd. and tianlin county Huaxu Food Co., Ltd. were all found to have coliforms.

　　Kai Zhong, deputy director of Kexin Food and Nutrition Information Exchange Center, said that coliforms are the general name of many bacteria, including Escherichia coli. It is a hygienic indicator bacterium, but it does not lead to disease if it is detected. The higher the detection value, the greater the possibility. Coliform bacteria can be detected in many foods, but as long as there are no pathogenic bacteria, it will generally not cause health hazards. As for the source of coliform bacteria, Kai Zhong said that coliform bacteria mainly come from the intestines of warm-blooded animals, but they are widely distributed in nature. Dishes, rice noodles and so on have coliform bacteria exceeding the standard, mostly because of secondary pollution.

　　According to the interpretation information released by the market supervision department, coliform bacteria is one of the commonly used indicator bacteria for food pollution at home and abroad. The detection of coliform bacteria in food suggests that it is more likely to be contaminated by pathogenic bacteria (such as Salmonella, Shigella and pathogenic Escherichia coli). Excessive coliform bacteria may be caused by the pollution of processing raw materials and packaging materials of products, or the pollution of products by production equipment and environment such as personnel and tools during production, and the incomplete sterilization of products with sterilization technology.

　　A variety of foods were found to have excessive drug residues.

　　In addition to coliform bacteria, some enterprises have been found to have drug residues and other problems. In the notice issued by Tai ‘an Municipal Market Supervision Administration on July 5, the bureau disclosed that the content of "procymidone" in leeks sold by Baxianju Commercial Bank in Ningyang County and Yanzhuang Haiwei Supermarket in Daiyue District was higher than the national food safety standard.

　　The Paper combed and found that in recent food sampling notices issued by many market supervision administrations, the problem of unqualified drug residue detection of enterprise-related products appeared.

　　On July 2nd, the 7th notice of Gansu Provincial Market Supervision Bureau on the sampling inspection of unqualified food showed that chloramphenicol, a drug banned from food animals, appeared in Jinghui brand acacia honey produced by Gansu Jinghui Bee Industry Co., Ltd..

　　On July 5, 2021, Jilin Provincial Market Supervision and Management Department’s 27th notice on unqualified food showed that the carp sold by Fengyun Aquatic Products Company in Automobile Industry Development Zone, Wuchang Fish sold by Yixin Aquatic Products Store in Chaoyang District and snakehead sold by Guo Di Seafood Wholesale Company in Kuancheng Agricultural Products and Aquatic Products Market were all found to exceed the standard.

　　The attachments of the above-mentioned relevant notices show that excessive coliforms are likely to cause intestinal diseases such as dysentery, which may cause symptoms such as vomiting and diarrhea. The pesticide procymidone is irritating to people’s eyes and skin. Long-term consumption of leeks with excessive procymidone residues may cause neurological disorders.

　　The market supervision department reminds consumers that when they find the unqualified products involved in the notice, they can call the 12315 hotline to complain or report.

On June 28th, CCTV reported that it was supposed to be the law enforcement department of traffic violators, but it acted as an "umbrella" for those who were rectified. Since June last year, Harbin has destroyed 251 "protective umbrellas" hidden in the traffic system in two batches. Hongsheng Wang, the former detachment leader of the municipal traffic administrative comprehensive law enforcement detachment, and Wang Wei, the former deputy detachment leader of the municipal traffic police detachment, have been "double-opened" and transferred to judicial organs for legal treatment.

129 law enforcers act as umbrellas for personal gain.

The phenomenon of "black car" in Harbin has a long history. As early as 2007, some people reported that some people bought scrapped vehicles as taxis and operated in different regions. By 2015 and 2016, the phenomenon of "black car" reached its peak, and even openly competed with regular taxis to grab passengers, asking for exorbitant prices, looting and extortion, and passengers suffered greatly.

Hongsheng Wang, the former detachment leader of Harbin Traffic Administrative Comprehensive Law Enforcement Detachment, accepted the trial site (data picture)

As soon as the "black car" is rectified, it will disappear, and if it is not rectified, it will be on the road again. For more than 10 years, the problem of "black cars" has been banned and repeated. The reason is that, in addition to the benefit drive, the "umbrella" within the management department is the direct cause of the proliferation of "black cars".

"We must resolutely guard against and correct what the people oppose and hate", and implement the requirements of the Supreme Leader General Secretary. The main leaders of Heilongjiang Province and Harbin clearly put forward that it is an important task to punish illegally operated vehicles and investigate and deal with "protective umbrellas" to safeguard the interests of the people. On June 26 last year, a task force was formally established in Harbin to crack down on illegal operation of vehicles and strictly investigate the "protective umbrella" behind them.

The Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection dispatched more than 30 business backbones of discipline inspection and supervision offices to participate in special rectification actions throughout the process. In the early stage, in order to investigate the problem more thoroughly, the cadres of the Commission for Discipline Inspection disguised themselves as unannounced visits, ventured to take a "black car" many times to understand the situation and mastered a lot of valuable information. After a month’s careful arrangement, starting from the early morning of July 27th, the Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection organized and coordinated the public security, transportation and other departments to launch the "closing the net" action.

After checking 16,800 related vehicles, seizing 214 illegally operated taxis, knocking out 7 "black car" gangs, and handing over the clues of 174 illegally operated taxis to the public security organs, the "protective umbrellas" hidden behind them were revealed one by one.

On November 13th of that year, the Supervision Bureau of Harbin Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection publicly reported the investigation and punishment of party member cadres and staff acting as "protective umbrellas" for illegally operating taxis, and severely investigated and held 129 party member cadres and staff accountable.

Among the 129 public officials notified, some involved the supervision department’s ineffective performance of the main responsibility, dereliction of duty, some involved the inaction and disorderly actions of law enforcement departments, some party member cadres lost their principles, interceded for illegal operators to ask for cars and mitigated punishment, some party member cadres tipped off illegal operators or tried to cover up the people involved, and even worse, they abused their powers because of accepting benefits and acted as "protective umbrellas" for the illegal operation of "black car" gangs.

Seven cadres, including Hongsheng Wang, the detachment leader of the Municipal Traffic Administrative Comprehensive Law Enforcement Detachment, and Li Lun, the political commissar, were expelled from the Party and public office for allegedly abusing their powers to commit crimes, harboring crimes or accepting bribes, and were transferred to judicial organs for legal treatment. Other party member cadres were punished by probation, dismissal of their posts in the Party, and severe warnings within the Party, depending on the seriousness of the case, for accepting bribes, informing people, caring for intercession and other violations.

Eight party member cadres, including Tan Hongzhi, former party secretary and director of the Municipal Transportation Bureau, Qi Ming, deputy director, and Liu Wei, leader of the discipline inspection team, were dismissed from their posts in the Party and removed from their posts by the administration for failing to perform their main responsibilities and supervisory responsibilities.

Among the 122 "protective umbrellas", 108 people are involved in the public security system.

It’s only been more than half a year since the last briefing. On June 25th, the Supervision Committee of the Harbin Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection informed 122 leading cadres and public officials about the issue of "protective umbrellas" for the "crazy trucks". Among them, Wang Wei, deputy detachment leader of the municipal traffic police detachment, Ming Changqing, team leader of the municipal traffic police Daoli, and Yu Guangjun, etc. 11 people were transferred to judicial organs for legal treatment.

Wang Daoan, the captain of the city traffic police, Li Renming, the captain of Taiping, Han Ming, the captain of Haxi, and Gao Wenfeng, the political commissar of Acheng Brigade, were dismissed. Zhang Jidong, the former captain of the patrol brigade of the municipal traffic police detachment, and Pan Guangping, the captain of the bungalow, were respectively punished by party discipline and government affairs.

Ma Tengxiang, former deputy director of Nangang Branch of the Municipal Public Security Bureau, intervened in law enforcement and provided protection for illegal acts of trucks. He was punished by staying in the party and determined his retirement benefits according to his non-leadership positions at the official level.

Fourteen public officials from Daoli District, Daowai District, nangang district, Xiangfang District, Songbei District Urban Management Law Enforcement Bureau and Transportation Management Office of the Municipal Transportation Bureau failed to perform their supervisory responsibilities, and were punished by party discipline and government affairs respectively.

These 122 leading cadres and public officials have various ways to violate the law and discipline, some abuse their powers to give the green light, some reveal secrets to sell people’s feelings, some organize groups to violate the rules, some interfere in law enforcement, some interfere in the project for personal gain, and some release water from the source to make changes, which seriously undermines the authority and credibility of law enforcement.

It is worth noting that among the 122 "protective umbrellas", 108 people are involved in the public security system, including 100 public security traffic police.

In order to make the cadres of public security organs deeply learn the painful lessons of this case, earnestly rectify the problems, thoroughly eliminate the negative effects, and reshape the new image of public security traffic police, on the 27th, Harbin public security organs held a warning education conference.

The Harbin Public Security Bureau has studied and promulgated the "six whatevers and six unifications" prohibition iron regulations, thoroughly investigated and sorted out hidden dangers in the overall scope, and comprehensively carried out special rectification in terms of team style, police handling, law enforcement quality, and collusion between traffic police and police stations and police officers.

At the same time, a key work inspector group was set up to station in the traffic police detachment to comprehensively supervise the work of building a clean and honest party style, rectifying work style, and providing four zero services. Solidly promote the strict management of the party and the police in an all-round way, and regard June 27 of each year as the overall "warning education day" to guide the education of the whole police not to forget the shame and alarm bells.

(Reporter Li Wenxue)